Oliver Mashari
コメント
-
Here is a post detailing the differences in BCs it should be as simple as this to make the change: c old codeboun side xmin absrc new codeboun side xmin impd auto
-
Sorry but I don't understand what you are trying to do or compare here... Yes you are seeing a close match in results between 2D-AXIX and the 3D model because these models will be exactly the same....
-
Yes and no. If you use this method you described above you will need to switch from absr to impd auto Oliver
-
正式なコメント
Hi Mike, The portal is currently being updated and has limited features for the meantime you can download the OnScale Lab installer from the below link: OnScale Lab Installer Best regards, Oliver
-
Hi Hxd, Are the extents of the model larger than the geometry? If they are the waves won't be absorbed. The BC is applied to the nodes on the extents of the model not the geometry unless the extent...
-
Hi Hyunjae Song, Well the axix model is revolved around the x-axis creating a cylindrical model where the radius of the model is determined by the length along the y-axis. This article has a small ...
-
Hi, Meshing will likely be the source of these abnormalities. What is the element size compared to the size of the source? Can you share the files via your prefered cloud sharing service and we can...
-
Hi Hxd, The model as likely went unstable during runtime. There are a few things you can try: Lowering the stability factor Increasing my meshing Replacing any absr BCs to impd.
-
Hi Hxd, It looks like you are just copying the materials what you should do is define one instance of the piezoelectric material then copy out that material. do loop I 1 $narelem 1 copy pzt_ext pzt...
-
Hey, Given my assumptions are correct you are using either PLOD SDF2 or PIEZ NOD2 both of these commands apply boundary conditions to the nodes that interface two materials. Either you haven't spec...