Chloe Allison
コメント
-
正式なコメント
Hi Jeong, Users need to pay for our local solver package. Only our Cloud package has a free account type. If you are a paying customer, please get in touch with your account manager or let me kno...
-
Hi there, We recommend setting up the meshing using the code in this article, this means if you change frequency the mesh will definitely resolve that frequency as the box size depends on the frequ...
-
正式なコメント
Hi Georg, I am aware there is not much content on FFLD models. We will put some more information on our Help Center so it is clear how to use it. For now I have a word document with some informatio...
-
Hi Piotr, Yes of course, send your files to us and I will take a look for you. Best Regards, Chloe.
-
正式なコメント
Hi Selim, You can apply a pressure load by specifying the nodes in the model you wish to apply pressure to (using plod sdef) so you can apply the pressure anywhere. If you want to apply it as a p...
-
正式なコメント
Hi Piotr, Yes this is possible in OnScale. Here is an example that should help you get an idea of how to set this up. Best Regards, Chloe
-
Hi Ray, Sorry for the initial confusion. Calc avrg is affected by the number of elements per wavelength as it is taking the average over an area. For 5 epw the wavelength, the area is 3 times bigge...
-
正式なコメント
Hi Rayanne, What a great question, you would not usually expect the amplitude of the signal to change if you are changing the mesh but if you look at what the model looks like at 5 elements per w...
-
正式なコメント
Hi Clint, You should have your extrapolation boundary at least one wavelength away from the source. It is strange that the command you are using to define the water is what is causing the differe...
-
Hi Robin, This is not currently possible but it is on our roadmap. Best Regards, Chloe.