Effective Absorbing boundary for Guided Wave simulations 回答済み

Respected Sir/Madam,

I am trying to conduct 3D guided wave simulation in a [90]_16 unidirectional composite material. I have given "absr" boundary conditions where I want the excitation signal to be absorbed by the boundary and not get reflected back but I see that it is clearly reflecting back. 

Kindly assist me in absorbing all reflections effectively.

The model files can be found in the link below: 

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aCutw5NYQZsoe61PgwZsOpTovA-JRWei?usp=sharing

Thanks

Robin

6件のコメント

  • 正式なコメント

    Hi Robin,

     

    We are unable to access the link above.

     

    Best Regards,

    Chloe

    コメントアクション パーマリンク
  • Hello Chloe,

    Please use this link instead:

    https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aCutw5NYQZsoe61PgwZsOpTovA-JRWei?usp=sharing

    Thanks

    Robin

    コメントアクション パーマリンク
  • Hi Robin,

    You haven't placed the absorbing boundary conditiions on the boundary of the model. For example on the XMAX side you have defined a surface node $indgrd-1 $indgrd-1 $j1 $jndgrd-1 $k2 $kndgrd-1 is there a reason why you are defining the BCs like this? I don't understand why you have this area of void elements around the IM7_90deg. You could get the same result by removing this area of void elements and placin the absorbers directly on the surfcae using:

    BOUN SIDE YMAX ABSR

    Absorbing boundary conditions aren't perfect it will look there are reflections in the runtime graphics. What I could suggest is placing a time history near the boundary and run 1 simulation with absorbing BCs and the other without and compare the signals.

    Regards,

    Oliver

     

     

     

    コメントアクション パーマリンク
  • Hello Oliver,

    I have updated the gdrive link.

    https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aCutw5NYQZsoe61PgwZsOpTovA-JRWei?usp=sharing

    This link has files and results for 2 scenarios: free boundaries at xmin, ymax and xmax; and absr boundaries at xmin, xmax and ymax.

    From both the results I saw that the signals had a higher amplitude close to the boundary for the case of the free boundaries compared to the absr boundaries.

    I cannot seem to see reflections if I look at the displacement waveforms, but I see the reflections in the snapshot video. Why do these reflections show up if they are not there in the time domain signals? Also is there a way that these reflections don't appear in the runtime graphics or snapshot video?

    Thanks for your help!

    Robin

    コメントアクション パーマリンク
  • Hi Robin,

    I can see from the files/images that you are using the rang option. Absorbing BC aren't perfect, all I can really suggest is ranging the data till it looks acceptable.

    Oliver

    コメントアクション パーマリンク
  • Hello Oliver,

    Thanks for your suggestion.

    In order to see more effectiveness in absorbing the boundary reflections. I tried to implement a non-reflective boundary method that we model in ANSYS and tried to model it in OnScale using line kelv and line visc elements but I received some errors and created a forum topic for it as well. Could you please assist me with that as well? The link is given below:

    https://support.onscale.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360013184317-Error-occurred-in-subroutine-extdta-Error-message-length-less-than-0-data

    コメントアクション パーマリンク

サインインしてコメントを残してください。

お探しのものを見つけられませんでしたか?

新規投稿